Next month, the Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) will vote on a proposed rule change that would reclassify visible bleeding from a horse’s mouth or nose from an elimination offence to a Recorded Warning.

The change would mean that:

• Riders are no longer eliminated for visible blood.

• A warning is issued instead, with penalties only after two warnings within 12 months.

• If bleeding is judged to be accidental (for example, from a “bitten tongue” or “nosebleed”) and the Veterinary Delegate confirms the horse is fit, the combination may continue competing.

This proposal has raised welfare concerns within the equestrian community, as visible bleeding indicates tissue trauma, regardless of intent. Critics warn that treating it as an administrative matter rather than a welfare issue could weaken safeguards intended to protect horses in elite sport.

Many argue that the FEI should instead take this opportunity to strengthen the so-called “blood rule” — by implementing mandatory veterinary oral examinations, clearer inspection protocols, and welfare standards that ensure competitive goals never outweigh the horse’s wellbeing.

As the equestrian world continues to navigate its social licence to operate, maintaining public trust will depend on transparent governance and demonstrable commitment to equine welfare.

The FEI’s proposed amendment to the Blood Rule has not yet been finalised, and there is still time for stakeholders and members of the public to share their perspectives before the General Assembly vote in November.

Those concerned about the implications for horse welfare and the sport’s public image are encouraged to contact the FEI ([email protected] ) and their National Federation, asking them to reject the reclassification of visible bleeding as a simple administrative warning. Calls for greater transparency, veterinary oversight, and welfare safeguards are essential to ensure that welfare remains central to competition policy.

Read the full article by Cristina Wilkins here.